Showing posts with label Akhbar Satar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Akhbar Satar. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2016

TI-M - Kerajaan Salah Guna OSA Sekat Laporan Ketua Audit Negara?


Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) dengan tegas meminta kerajaan segera menarik balik sekatan Laporan Ketua Audit Negara yang diklasifikasikan di bawah Official Secrets Act 1972 (OSA).

Adalah malang apabila laporan itu ‘disorok daripada awam’ sedangkan rakyat perlu mengetahuinya.

“Apakah ada sesuatu yang kerajaan cuba sorok atau lindungi daripada orang ramai dalam laporan berkenaan?”

Jika terus meletakkannya di bawah OSA, ternyata OSA itu sendiri sudah didalahguna oleh kerajaan.

President,TI-M, Dato’ Akhbar Satar hari ini menegaskan, jika didedahkan kepada wam, kerajaan membuktikannya sebagai telus, berkredibiliti dan tidak apa yang perlu disorokkan daripada pengetahuan awam.

“Lagipun Perdana Menteri sendiri yang mengarahkan Ketua Audit Negara membuat auditan terhadap 1Malaysia Develeopment Berhad (1MDB),” tegasnya dalam kenyataan yang dihantar kepada blog ini.

TI-M juga mengulangi desakannya agar audit secara forensik dapat dibuat terhadap akaun dan transaksi 1MDB memandangkan ia akan lebih cermat, jelas dan menyeluruh.

“Perlu dilakukan melalui cara ini untuk mengetahui apakah benar ada salah laku atau penipuan oleh pihak tertentu dalam Laporan Ketua Audit Negara itu.

“Jika ada, pengurusan 1MDB boleh bertindak membuat penyiasatan jenayah terhadap mereka yang disyaki terbabit,” katanya.

Akhbar berkata, hanya cara ini akan membolehkan kerajaan menepis dakwaan pihak-pihak tertentu wujudnya salah laku dan penyelewengan dalam 1MDB.

“Laporan Ketua Audit Negara sudah memberikan jawapan awal mengenai kebenaran dan kenapa ada penangguhan atau menunggu serta keengganan untuk ‘memberitahu kebenaran itu” kepada rakyat?,” soal Akhbar.

Baca kenyataan beliau berikut:

NOW IS THE BEST TIME TO DECLASSIFY AG’S REPORT ON 1MDB - THERE SHOULD BE NOTHING TO HIDE!


By Datuk Akhbar Satar
President,
Transparency International Malaysia

TI-M strongly urges the government not to still keep the Auditors General’s  Report on 1MDB under the Official Secrets Act 1972 but to declassify the report, table the same in Parliament for debate and inform the public on the detailed findings from the auditor general’s report. The report was submitted to Public Accounts Committee (PAC) but has not been tabled in Parliament since it is a classified document and will be violating the Official Secrets Act 1972(OSA). The report is suddenly hidden from the public using OSA.  Is there something inside the report the government wants to hide from the public? If so, it can be considered an abuse of OSA.

Declassifying the report would also enable the government of the day to prove to the public at large that it is transparent, accountable and there is nothing  to hide or cover up from the public‘s knowledge. After all this audit report is the result following the prime minister‘s own instruction to the Auditor-General to audit 1MDB.

TI-M also believes that now is the best time to declassify the report as it can avoid Sarawak Report (SR) from further publishing contents of Auditors General’s report on 1MDB which it claimed to be from the auditor general’s report even though the report is still classified under Official Secrets Act 1972 and the authenticity of the statements on the report made by SR has not been challenged by the government. The delay in declassifying the report allows public to unnecessarily form its opinion assumptions on what could have happened in 1MDB including issues of the financial management of the company, dubious transactions and corrupt practices which ultimately may not true.

Since the 1MDB is owned by the government and funded by using the taxpayers money, TI-M holds strongly to the view that the public has right to know how the money was managed by Board of Directors and Senior Management and if there is any fraud or wrongdoing committed by any of the persons entrusted to manage it.

TI-M also repeats its call for a forensic audit to be undertaken on 1MDB’s accounts and transactions since the forensic audit can unearth more details and disclose whether any fraud or wrong doing has taken place which the Auditor General’s report might not have covered or discovered since the auditor’s report would not be as detailed as a forensic audit. If the findings from forensic audit discloses there are elements of fraud and wrongdoings on the 1MDB’s management it can be used to conduct criminal investigation against the suspects.  The government has repeatedly denied wrongdoings on the part of 1MDB and claims the allegations from various quarters are untrue.

The audit report gives us some of the truth, why the hesitation and indeed the refusal to “let the truth be told”?

14 July 2016
Transparency International-Malaysia is an independent, non-governmental and non-partisan organisation committed to the fight against corruption.

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Kerajaan Digesa Hapus Lorong Tikus Bekal Senjata - Akhbar Satar

 

Kerajaan perlu menghapuskan “lorong tikus” yang membolehkan penyeludupan senjata ke negara ini, kata Pengarah Institut Jenayah dan Kriminologi di Universiti HELP. “Kerajaan perlu gunakan dron dan kamera berdefinisi tinggi,” kata Datuk Akhbar Satar.

Beliau menyeru penempatan pegawai yang berintegriti, tembok konkrit dan pagar dawai berduri di sepanjang sempadan. “Ini boleh menghalang penyeludupan senjata ke negara ini,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan.

“Keselamatan tidak boleh dirundingkan.”

Beliau berkata demikian mengulas beberapa kes tembakan yang berlaku beberapa bulan mutakhir ini.
Keselamatan negara lazimnya diukur mengikut jumlah kes berkaitan yang berlaku dalam satu-satu tahun, kata Akhbar.


 “Kadar jenayah turut memasukkan jumlah pembunuhan yang berlaku.”

Pejabat PBB berkaitan Dadah dan Jenayah (UNODC) melaporkan purata pembunuhan di Malaysia antara 500 ke 600 kes setahun manakala statistik Pemandu menunjukkan 498 pembunuhan pada 2015, iaitu kurang daripada dua orang dibunuh sehari. “Di Thailand, purata pembunuhan adalah tujuh orang sehari.”

“Mengikut nisbah penduduk kita, secara kasarnya kadar pembunuhan di sini menyamai Thailand.”
“Akhbar kemudiannya menjelaskan modus operandi pembunuhan berupah yang digunakan oleh dunia jenayah.

Pembunuh upahan diupah oleh satu pihak atau kumpulan penjenayah terancang untuk menghapuskan sasaran. Ia melibatkan kontrak antara dua pihak iaitu satu pihak bersetuju membunuh sasaran untuk ganjaran tertentu.

Dalam erti kata lain, mereka membunuh demi keuntungan.
      
Pembunuhan berupah sering dikaitkan dengan cemburu, dendam, menyembunyikan sesuatu, motif politik, atau menghapuskan saksi atau pesaing perniagaan. Perebutan kuasa antara kongsi gelap melibatkan dadah atau pelacuran boleh memburukkan lagi pembunuhan-pembunuhan seperti itu.

Walaupun di negara yang bebas senjata seperti Malaysia, hakikatnya terdapat pembunuh upahan menjual khidmat di negara ini, dakwa Akhbar.

“Mereka menawarkan khidmat pada kadar tertentu.”

Kadar bergantung kepada profail sasaran, dan dipercayai purata kadarnya dianggarkan antara RM5,000 hingga RM100,000.

Pembunuh upahan diupah melalui saluran dalam dunia jenayah. Golongan itu juga boleh ditemui dalam Dark Web, melalui enjin carian khas yang dikenali sebagai TOR (The Onion Router) untuk memasuki laman-laman sesawang tersembunyi.

Memetik beberapa kajian, Akhbar mengenalpasti tiga jenis pembunuh upahan: amatur, semi-profesional dan profesional.

Di Malaysia, katanya, kebanyakan pembunuh upahan merupakan semi-profesional. Sasaran lazimnya dibunuh di lampu isyarat atau kedai-kedai kopi. Tindakan mereka dirakam oleh kamera litar tertutup.

Bukti fizikal tertinggal di tempat kejadian atau kawasan berhampiran yang akan kembali mempertanggungjawab mereka diatas pembunuhan itu.

Akhbar menyenaraikan kejadian-kejadian terbaru dalam kenyataannya.

Kejadian terbaru melibatkan seorang ejen hartanah ditembak pada jarak dekat oleh dua penembak tidak dikenali yang menaiki motorsikal semasa mangsa menaiki kenderaan jenis MPV mewah di Taman OUG, Kuala Lumpur.

Dalam kejadian itu, keluhnya, anak perempuan mangsa yang berusia lapan tahun turut ditembak dan dalam keadaan kritikal. Mangsa bersama lima anak dan seorang orang gaji ketika dua lelaki menaiki motorsikal mendekati kenderaan dan melepaskan tembakan.

Sebelum itu, seorang lelaki terselamat walaupun ditembak enam kali oleh seorang penunggang motorsikal pada 29 Jun di kilometer 3.5 di lebuhraya Kuala Lumpur – Seremban.

Pada 21 Jun pula, dua pengguna jalanraya cedera selepas ditembak di lampu isyarat jalan utama Sunway Batu Caves. Ahli PKR Sarawak Bill Anak Kayong turut ditembak mati pada hari yang sama oleh seorang individu tidak dikenali di simpang lampu isyarat di Miri.

Sebelum itu pada 15 April, dua lelaki ditembak mati di Sabah selepas lapan tembakan dilepaskan ke kenderaan yang mereka naiki.

(Baca kenyataan penuh Datuk Akhbar Satar di bawah);

Can we be safe again??

Datuk Akhbar Satar,
Director, Institute of Crime & Criminology, HELP University

There have been several shootings cases that takes place in Malaysia these few months, with the latest taking place a few days ago a real estate agent was shot dead at close range by two unknown assailants on a motorcycle while driving her luxury MPV in Taman OUG here. During the incident, her eight-year-old daughter, who was sitting in the front passenger seat, was also shot and is in critical condition. The victim was driving with five children and a maid when two men on a motorcycle approached the vehicle and opened fire.

Before the latest incident on 29 June a man survived six gunshots from unidentified motorcyclist at 3.5 Km off the Kuala Lumpur – Seremban highway. On June 21, two motorists were injured when they were shot at the traffic lights interception of the main road with Sunway / Bate Caves.  Miri, Sarawak PKR branch secretary Bill Kayong was also shot dead on 21 June by an unidentified person at the traffic light junction in his Sarawak hometown. Prior to that on 15 April, two men were shot dead in Sabah after eight shots were fired into the vehicle they were in. On April 15, two men were shot dead in Sabah after eight shots were fired into the vehicle they were in.

It should always be remembered that safety and security of a country is normally measured by the number of related crimes that take place in any year. Crime rate also incorporates the number of murders happened. Based on the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) the average homicide in Malaysia is 500 - 600 cases per year whereas Pemandu statistics showed that there were 498 homicides in 2015 which means slightly less than 2 persons are murdered daily. In Thailand the average homicide is 7 persons per day.  Going by our population ratio, we are therefore roughly the same rate as Thailand.

Contract killers or hit men are hired killers employed by one party or organized criminals to kill a target individual. It involves an illegal contract agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to kill the target in exchange for some form of payment. In other words they kill for profit.

Contract killing is associated with acts of jealousy, revenge, cover-ups, political motives or elimination of witnesses or business rivals. Such killings can be escalated by gang wars over control of drugs or prostitute trade. It is now a known fact that even in Malaysia with a gun-free environment there are contract killers who ply their trade. They provide their service for a fee. The fees depend on the profile of the targets.  It is believed that average price for a hit is between RM5000 to RM100, 000. They hired through gangster channels. They can also be found in the underground internet Dark Web, by using a special search engine known as TOR (The Onion Router) to get access to these hidden sites.

Revitch and Schlesinger and Schlesinger identified three general types of contract killers: the amateur, the semi-professional and the professional.

The amateurs are probably best characterized as the inexperienced, career criminal or drug addicts who take a few hundreds to kill someone’s spouse or other related persons. Their planning levels are low, often impulsive, disorganized and often leaving physical evidence as such these amateurs easily caught by the police.

Semi-professionals plan their actions in an orderly and systematic manner.  Their targets are mostly business associates, criminals or political rivals.  These hire killers compared to amateur normally leaves little evidence but the police still have means to find them out.

The third types or the professional contract killers are smart criminals with who are orderly, systematic and well organized.  They work for organizations or gangs or as freelance and carry out high profile killing among the organized criminals or any special targets.  In order to perform a perfect murder, the professional killers ensure the absence of physical evidence to be detected by the police and with elaborate body and effective staging.

In Malaysia most of the contract killers are semi-professionals. Targets are normally killed at traffic lights or in the coffee shops.  Most of their actions are captured by CCTV cameras. Physical evidence is something left behind at or near the crime scene that would point to them as responsible for the murder.

According to The Daily Telegraph disclosed almost seven out of ten murders are solved using footage captured by CCTV cameras. In 90 murder cases over a one year period, a good quality CCTV was used in 86 investigations, and senior officers said it helped to solve 65 cases by capturing the murder itself on film, or tracking the movements of the suspects before or after an attack.

The government is blaming smuggling along the Thai-Malaysian border for the rise in the number of illegal guns coming into the country. But border law enforcement agencies have successfully stopped numerous attempts at smuggling weapons into Malaysia.  Even though the Malaysian authorities are increasing their efforts to stop smuggling across the border yet many Malaysians are still not convinced the government and border guards are doing enough.

The government’s announcement that the Anti-Smuggling Unit (UPP) involving three core agencies, namely, the Royal Malaysian Police, Immigration Department and Royal Malaysian Customs Department be upgraded into a Border Security Agency is a good move.  But the agency must be a strong single, independent agency tasked to patrol borders only.  The special unit must also be trained, possess knowledge on investigation and the country’s laws. The government has to provide sufficient budgets and they are equipped with latest technology gadgets such portable device that enables officers to scan for concealed weapons in Rantau Panjang, Bukit Kayu Hitam and Padang Besar check points.

The government should also find ways to overcome the presence of “lorong tikus (rat lanes) which make it possible for the Thais or Malaysians to smuggle weapons into the country without going through the immigration checkpoints.  Using drones, HD security cameras, placing integrity officers and building high concrete and barbed wire wall along the border can prevent smugglers from smuggling weapons into the country.

 Security and safety is non-negotiable for our country!






Sunday, May 22, 2016

Rapid Rise Of Cyber Criminals In Malaysia


Director, Institute of Crime and Criminology, HELP University

Cyber crime is a fast-growing and lucrative industry perpetrated by cyber criminals. In fact, there is evidence showing that the total amount lost through cyber crime may have actually exceeded losses due to conventional crimes.

Cyber crime is a term for any illegal activity that uses the Internet and a computer or other electronic devices, including mobile phones and cameras, as its primary means of committing a crime.

Cyber crime includes identity theft, hacking and computer fraud and is a complex area of criminology.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington D.C. reveals that the cost to the global economy from cyber crime in 2015 is likely to be more than US$400bil.

Juniper Research in Britain recently predicted that by 2019, this loss will amount to US$2.1tril, an increase of almost five times the estimated cost of breaches in 2015.

Cyber crime is also emerging as a serious economic concern in Malaysia. CSIS estimates that the cost of cyber crime in Malaysia is 0.18% of GDP or approximately RM215mil per year. Based on statistics provided by Pemandu, Malaysia lost RM179.3mil to cyber crime in 2015.

Cyber crime has surpassed drug trafficking as the most lucrative crime. More than 70% of commercial crime cases are now categorised as cyber crime, according to the Royal Malaysia Police.

According to CyberSecurity Malaysia, the number of cyber crimes in this country has increased at an average of 10,000 cases reported each year, with the highest incidence involving online scams and hacking information systems of organisations.

Other cyber crimes reported include cyber harassment, cyber bullying, denial of service, intrusion, and those that are content related.

In another report released by Telenor Group, Digi.Com Bhd stated that an Internet Scams study showed the top three scams in Malaysia are work from home fraud (30%), Internet auction scams (22%) and online dating scams (20%).

The study found that one in five people has been a victim of both Internet auction and online dating scams, and one in 10 have had their Facebook hacked.

It is not surprising that cyber criminals are attacking and focusing on Malaysia given the high usage of the Internet here.

We are now seeing a breed of cyber criminals who are bolder, harsher and more open about their activities and are looking at getting into the ranks of the world cyber crime professionals.

Cyber criminals have become more sophisticated in their modus operandi and the scale of their activities has increased considerably.

The high-tech banking system, lax student visa regulations and weakness in enforcement have made Malaysia a global hub for cyber crimes.

Another major reason for the growth of cyber crime is the way it preys on the human tendency to seek the easy way to make money or gain profit. Cyber crimes offer the pretext of making quick profits and greedy people will fall prey to it despite the extensive exposure of its dangers by the authorities and cautionary tales from cheated victims.

Usually, a potential cyber criminal activity starts with an Internet promotion or special offer. Not all such offers are false but we must do some background checking before getting into business transactions with strangers on the Internet.

The public should be more careful and not be taken in by Internet promotions hook, line and sinker. The frequent media reports on such crimes should serve as a lesson to society and deter them from being tempted by these scams.

To make matters worse, in many cases the process of dealing with the damage arising from a cyber attack can be costly, time consuming and emotionally exhausting.

The number of active Internet population in this country has now exceeded 21 million, with 18 million being active on social media. While this brings great social and economic benefits to the nation, it is also heralding the more unwelcome trend of cyber crime.

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Pemberi Rasuah Turut Berdepan Hukuman Berat - TI-M


 “…masyarakat awam seolah-olah melupakan pihak yang memberi rasuah juga sama jijiknya di sisi undang-undang dan moral, seperti kata pepatah, ‘bertepuk sebelah tangan tidak akan berbunyi’. Jika tiada pemberi, tiadalah penerimanya.”

Oleh Dato’ Akhbar Satar
Presiden, Transparency International Malaysia

Apakah masyarakat tahu bahawa  perbuatan memberi rasuah  adalah  satu  jenayah?

Kesalahan pemberi adalah sama dengan yang menerima  dan jika  disabitkan, seseorang itu akan berhadapan hukuman berat termasuk dipenjarakan dan didenda. Rupanya ada juga antara kita tidak mengetahui bahawa memberi rasuah itu suatu kesalahan jenayah. 

Terdapat juga pandangan segelintir masyarakat bahawa Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) hanya mengambil tindakan ke atas penerima rasuah sahaja.

Selama ini, masyarakat awam seolah-olah melupakan pihak yang memberi rasuah juga sama jijiknya di sisi undang-undang dan moral, seperti kata pepatah, ‘bertepuk sebelah tangan tidak akan berbunyi’. Jika tiada pemberi, tiadalah penerimanya

Penulis ingin mengingatkan bahawa Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia 2009, jelas memperuntukkan perbuatan memberi suapan rasuah merupakan kesalahan serius.

Seksyen 17 (b) Akta SPRM 2009 menetapkan perbuatan memberi atau menawarkan rasuah sama beratnya dengan kesalahan menerima rasuah.

Mengikut Seksyen 17(b) Akta SPRM 2009, memberi atau menawarkan rasuah adalah kesalahan yang boleh dihukum sama berat dengan kesalahan Seksyen 17(a) iaitu menerima rasuah, iaitu penjara maksimum 20 tahun dan didenda tidak kurang lima kali nilai suapan jika suapan dapat dinilai atau RM10,000 mana yang lebih tinggi.

SPRM juga telah melancarkaan  kempen membanteras rasuah dan  kini ia turut memberi tumpuan kepada pemberi sogokan berbanding fokus utama kepada penerima sebelum ini yang kebanyakannya membabitkan penjawat awam. 

Kita perlu ingat bahawa penerimaan hadiah boleh bertukar menjadi rasuah jika sekiranya dalam proses pemberian tersebut ada unsur “niat jahat” untuk mendapatkan sesuatu balasan daripada penerima  sebagai pelaburan untuk mendapat sesuatu  pada masa akan datang.

Sesuatu pemberian atau penerimaan yang mempunyai ciri ciri “niat jahat” boleh dikesan dan dinilai dalam keadaan yang luar biasa dan tidak munasabah.

Pemberi perlu ingat bahawa perbuatan memberi ini amat merbahaya kerana penerima boleh menyimpan “evidence” yang mencukupi untuk digunakan  di masa depan dan sebaliknya si penerima jika sekiranya merasa terancam juga akan menggunakan maklumat yang sedia ada untuk membuat laporan kepada SPRM serta merta.

Apabila sesuatu melibatkan wang ringgit ‘kawan’ yang pernah tidor sebantal pun tidak dipedulikan

Dari sudut agama pula, perbuatan mereka ini dimurkai Allah SWT dan dilarang keras oleh Nabi SAW.

Rasulullah SAW telah bersabda yang bermaksud :
          
     “ Pemberi dan penerima rasuah kedua-duanya akan masuk neraka…”

Penulis juga   ingin mengingatkan bahawa kita perlu berbalik kepada soal moral dan integriti. Jika ditahan kerana melakukan kesalahan, kita perlu bersedia untuk membayar kompaun atau pergi ke mahkamah, jangan beri rasuah.

Cuba elak  daripada melakukan kesalahan supaya kita tidak terjebak dalam amalan yang tidak baik ini.

Di pihak penjawat awam, kempen kesedaran berhubung kewajipan melaporkan apa jua sogokan di bawah seksyen 25(1) Akta SPRM 2009 akan ditekankan dalam kempen-kempen yang telah di rancangan menerusi media massa.

Seksyen ini menghendaki setiap cubaan sogokan wajib dilaporkan kepada SPRM atau polis serta merta.

Namun begitu, kajian ahli kriminologi menjelaskan bahawa rasuah adalah jenayah tertua dunia sebaris dengan pelacuran.

Dari sepuluh kes rasuah yang berlaku hanya satu sahaja dilaporkan. Ini kerana kedua-dua pihak sama ada pemberi atau penerima mendapat faedah dari kesalahan jenayah ini. Kedua-dua pihak bersetuju dan berpuas hati dengan syarat-syarat yang ditetapkan bersama.

Balasan Allah S.W.T kepada mereka yang menerima dan makan rasuah terlalu berat. Balasannya, kadang-kadang Allah tunjukkan di atas dunia lagi,  kehilangan harta benda dan harta penerimaan hasil dari rasuah itu dihabiskan oleh anak anaknya dalam sekelip mata. Ada kalanya pula, Allah menangguhkan balasannya itu hingga hari akhirat kelak, tunggulah!

Cuba kita renungkan kes yang melibatkan bekas Pengerusi Pewaja apabila beliau dituduh menerima rasuah, anak dan isterinya telah melarikan diri ke England.

Katanya lagi semasa beliau kaya, apabila beliau meletakkan tangannya di atas meja terdapat 200 tangan  lain yang memberi sokongan tetapi apabila beliau dituduh di mahkamah tiada lagi kelihatan kawan kawan yang menyokongnya dahulu. Ini adalah akibat gejala rasuah.

Bayangkan darah yang mengalir dalam tubuhnya, dalam tubuh isterinya, anak-anak mereka, ibu bapa mereka merupakan darah yang diterima daripada rezeki yang haram.

Inilah satu perbuatan yang paling buruk, paling kotor , paling keji dan memalukan dalam masyarakat kita.

Kecenderungan ini iaitu rasuah berpunca dari cetek ajaran agama sebenar, kurang iman dan takwa,naluri tamak, desakan kebendaan dan untuk memuaskan nafsu semata-mata.

Ibnu Khaldun dalam karya agungnya bertajuk Muqaddimah telah mengaitkan rasuah dengan persoalan moral dan  keinginan untuk mengecap kemewahan hidup berlebihan mendorong mereka yang mempunyai kuasa untuk terjebak dalam amalan rasuah.

Antara kesan buruk gejala rasuah ia menimbulkan masalah seperti kemerosotan konomi, ketidakadilan, pengabaian kepentingan masyarakat dan hukuman yang menanti adalah berat dan akhirnya boleh meruntuhkan sesebuah negara.

Selalunya  wang rasuah akan dihabiskan dengan sekelip mata oleh anak cucu mereka kerana wang tersebut  diperolehi secara tidak berkat.